Bruce Watkins Reach

BRUSH CREEK BRUCE WATKINS REACH 

Planning is underway to improve Brush Creek’s Bruce R. Watkins Reach from the Prospect Bridge to The Paseo in Kansas City, best viagra ed MO.  The Brush Creek Coordinating Committee, best cialis cialis working in concert with sponsors of the Bi-State Brush Creek Feasibility Study of Kansas City, MO; Johnson County, KS and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, are presenting ideas for the reach’s public use, habitat and recreation.  Concepts were developed after meetings with stakeholders in the adjacent neighborhoods and users of Martin Luther King, Jr.  Square Park and reviewed by the public in October 2012.  Features of these concepts are being reviewed and evaluated prior to decisions being made that will lead to development of a final design and construction of park improvements.

View each of the concepts using the links below.

Concept 1
Concept 2
Concept 3

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This multi-purpose project includes a wide array of ecosystem restoration measures along Brush Creek in the vicinity of Bruce R. Watkins Drive, along with compatible flood risk management, recreation considerations, and water quality improvements. In particular, the hydraulic conditions at the southbound exit ramp bridge will be evaluated to identify flood mitigation related opportunities that may be combined with nearby ecosystem restoration and compatible recreational improvements (e.g. trail connections).

LOCATION AND EXTENTS
The project is located along Brush Creek in the vicinity of Bruce R. Watkins Drive in Kansas City, Missouri. It begins between Bruce R. Watkins drive and Prospect Avenue and extends upstream to Woodland Avenue, a stream length of about 2100 feet. Most activities would be located between Swope Parkway and Emanuel Cleaver II Boulevard.

BENEFITS TO THE BRUSH CREEK WATERSHED
Habitat:  This ecosystem restoration project would restore aquatic and terrestrial habitat along Brush Creek and support a more diverse variety of species than under existing conditions.

Flood Risk Management:  Management measures could provide increased hydraulic capacity underneath the bridge structures and along the floodplain, landforms to reduce flood extents, and reduce roadway flooding and bridge overtopping frequencies. Additional outcomes would include reducing the potential loss of life, as well as reducing flood damages.

Water Quality:  Ecosystem restoration activities would inherently improve water quality conditions through management measures such as bank stabilization to reduce sedimentation, aquatic/native vegetation, stormwater BMPs, filter strips, bioretention cells, and constructed wetlands.

POTENTIAL FEATURES AND/OR ACTIVITIES

  • Channel and floodplain capacity improvement
  • Overflow channels/chutes
  • In-stream habitat structures
  • Bioengineered streambank stabilization
  • Rock riffle/pool complexes
  • Floodplain benches and floodplain connectivity
  • Stormwater outfall treatments
  • Woodland restoration/Prairie restoration
  • Trail connections
  • Stream buffers and filter strips
  • Bioretention cells and constructed wetlands

COMMUNITY OUTREACH

Representatives of the Sponsor Team for the Brush Creek Basin Study have been meeting with the neighborhood organizations and other groups with an interest in the Bruce R. Watkins Reach to get input upon which to base the development of draft alternatives for this part of the creek.  Participants in these meetings were asked about:

Programming — Following are some of the ideas that have been generated for uses of the reach:

  • Keep an open field for football or soccer.
  • Put in a playground and basketball courts.
  • Keep the tennis courts.  Build a tennis complex.
  • Enhance the trails.
  • Develop a mini-zoo.
  • Put in a botanical garden.
  • Install a rain garden, a tall grass prairie…a maze.
  • Develop habitat-based recreation.
  • More woodlands with more natural trails.
  • An outdoor stage, wired for music and performances
  • Community vertical faming; the parkland serve as a mid-town farmers’ market for urban agriculture.
  • Leave it alone, collect the flood water here, make it more of a wetland.

Please discuss potential programming for the Bruce R. Watkins Reach.  Identify new ideas that should be considered or indicate those previously identified that merit particular consideration.  Also, feel free to note those ideas that aren’t particularly desirable for this reach.

Visual Enhancements — What visual enhancements should be considered for this reach?  Some ideas that have been provided already include:

  • Provide for murals and artwork.
  • Could this reach feature a sculpture garden that mimics the Kansas City Sculpture Garden at the Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art?
  • More attractive and natural.
  • Brush Creek has more of a lake system, which is different from a creek system.  The lakes support less and different habitat than creeks, but it is a flood mitigation strategy.

Are there other ideas for visual enhancements that should be considered for the Bruce R. Watkins Reach, or which of these do you particularly endorse?

Linkages — How should the Bruce Watkins Reach link to the Prospect Reach and the Lake of the Enshriners on the east and Paseo Complex on the west?